
MANAGEMENT
As a center focused on climate change and sustainability, CASC is concerned about environmental resource use and injustices incurred by the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) such as Chat GPT and Copilot. While companies which produce AI products do not share specific data on carbon-based energy and water use for their applications, the most accepted data point for now is the example of an AI application using 10x the amount of energy as a simple Google search for the same query.
Until more is known about the environmental and social costs of AI usage, we encourage you to consider employing AI only when it is essential for the task at hand. There is a learning curve to using AI properly, therefore we suggest you learn what AI can and cannot do in order to determine if it should be used. We encourage everyone to follow these guidelines as a means of reducing the overall environmental and social impacts AI:
Below is a list of resources for students to use before turning to AI for help:
Lastly, please talk to your friends, colleagues, and students about limiting their use of AI.
For more information and research studies about the concerns surrounding AI, please select from the links below.
Since the public version of ChatGPT arrived in 2023, educators and administrators across the country have been scrambling to understand and prepare for the impacts of Generative AI on education and society. Since then, we鈥檝e seen a host of new Generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Midjourney, Google Gemini, and NRP Nautilus. The discourse on these tools has generally focused on how faculty and students might ethically implement them, while a wider discussion on the social, global, environmental, and economic costs of processing all the data associated with these tools has more recently emerged.
Here at the 爆料社区 Climate Action and Sustainability Center, we are concerned with the macro-environmental impacts of GenAI tools, specifically the potential for these technologies to accelerate climate change and therefore drive already aggrieved communities into further precarity and dislocation. We ask: What are the global impacts of AI on the climate? Which communities tend to bear the brunt of crises resulting from climate change? What are the social, political, and economic conditions resulting from these crises? And what can we do to prevent and/or mitigate them?
In asking these questions, we also seek to understand the compounded costs of AI from labor devaluation and mass surveillance to source bias and disinformation to increased resource consumption and large-scale climate disasters like heat waves, fires, monsoons, and flooding. For instance: what is the relationship between Generative AI, climate change, and public policy? Can AI help us solve some of the world鈥檚 most pressing climate issues and prepare for the downstream effects of those solutions? Or are the promised (but not yet realized) benefits of AI worth its costs? What are those costs? If AI can be said to 鈥減ollute鈥 the planet, does it also pollute, as some of the below sources suggest, the internet with disinformation; does it pollute human social and political relations with bias and private interest? How do these social and political discourses effect approaches to climate change and climate justice? What policies and practices can we implement to avoid these consequences? What can individual AI users do to reduce harm?
In the following collection of essays and journal articles, scholars and journalists begin to address these questions on the intersections of AI, climate, and society. This is a quickly developing field of interest and the literature continues to expand, so we will continue to develop it as new material and findings become available.
List of Sources
A few resources to keep track of GenAI and energy use as the literature develops:
What resources are required to train GenAI? What resources are required to prompt GenAI? What impact does the increased extraction and consumption have on the global climate? How much land do AI data centers require? What other resources do AI data centers require? Can GenAI help solve the climate crisis? Do use cases on AI solutions to climate change stack up to the literature on AI鈥檚 potential to solve the climate crisis? How does GenAI influence climate change discourse?
How much energy does AI use? What are the environmental costs of AI energy use?
How much water does AI use? How much of that comes from prompts to Generative AI?
What effect does AI have on the narratives and outcomes of climate change, from extreme weather and algae blooms to inland gentrification and displacement/dispossession? Which communities are most effected? How have they responded? What policies are in place? How does climate justice differ from environmental justice?
Which communities are most impacted by data center infrastructure? What are the localized environmental impacts of data centers? What effect do data centers have on climate policies?
What is the decay rate of AI digital data compared to printed materials? What practices and policies will help curb AI energy and water consumption? How can we mitigate the environmental and geographic impact of data centers? Can AI be used to improve water treatment, distribution, etc.? Can AI help with the climate crisis?
Where does Southern California get energy? How much do we use? What are the environmental effects? What communities are impacted? Are there any efforts to improve efficiency and quality of energy in California?
Are AI outputs reliable? How much effort does it require to verify that they are? Are they original? How many prompts and revisions does it take to create a viable AI-enabled essay? To what degree is that essay original work? To what degree does it represent student effort or thinking? Who owns material created using GenAI?
Who trains Generative AI models? Are they reliable? Can they be manipulated? Where do they get all that data?
What data does Generative AI collect? What does it do with that data? Is it secure?
What is the impact on labor and working conditions? Who profits? At what cost? Are Generative AI tools just plagiarism machines? What questions does this pose for academic integrity?
Is AI 鈥渋nevitable鈥? Who benefits? Who suffers? In what ways does AI reify existing power structures in terms of race, class, gender, sexuality, and ability? What are the long-term social, political, and cultural effects? What are the cognitive benefits or harms of consistent dependence on AI?
Does it work? Does it also make use of AI (and all that implies in terms of energy and reliability)?